TeraWulf has now shed nearly 19% in a single week, closing at $21.18 on July 2 — yet the bears responsible for that thesis aren't pressing their advantage.
The most striking tension in the current setup is between the scale of the sell-off and the restraint shown by short sellers. At 25.2% of the free float — around 105.7 million shares — short interest remains one of the heaviest bear bets in the crypto mining sector. But it has barely moved. The week-on-week change was a fractional decline of 2.3%, and over the past month positions are down nearly 4%. Shorts covered on the way up, then covered again on the way down — a pattern that suggests the short base is managing risk rather than adding conviction. Borrow costs reflect this calm: at 0.68%, they've eased 7% on the week and remain historically cheap for a name with this level of short interest. Availability has tightened modestly to around 67%, down from 114% in mid-June, but is far above the 52-week low of 1.6% — the lending market is not under stress. The ORTEX short score has been remarkably stable, hovering between 69 and 71 for the past two weeks, confirming no dramatic shift in the short-side posture.
Options markets, meanwhile, have turned decisively less defensive than last week. The put/call ratio has dropped to 0.35 — below its 20-day average of 0.37 — and the z-score of -1.1 is the least bearish reading in weeks. That's a meaningful reversal from the prior note, which flagged the PCR spiking to two standard deviations above average. Options traders hedged into the July 1 decline; as of July 2, they had stopped adding protection despite the stock continuing lower. This is either capitulation or a sign that the market views current levels as closer to fair value.
The Street, at least, still sees significant upside. Eleven analysts carry buy ratings with a mean price target of $36.32 — roughly 72% above the current price. The most recent initiations tell the story: Citigroup started at Buy with a $36 target on June 29, and BofA Securities began coverage at Buy with a $34 target on June 15. Both are bellwether initiations that arrived as the stock was already falling. Bernstein's June 4 start at Outperform with a $46 target implies the most aggressive bull case. The bull argument centres on TeraWulf's HPC pivot — transitioning from a pure bitcoin miner to a compute infrastructure platform with a nuclear-power advantage on cost and carbon. The bear case points to persistent operating losses (the P/E is deeply negative at -106x), dependence on external financing, and exposure to crypto volatility. The EV/EBITDA multiple has compressed to 37x over 30 days, down from around 40x, as the stock has re-rated lower while the earnings trajectory remains challenged.
The peer group context matters here. This is not a WULF-specific story. CIFR fell 22% on the week, CORZ lost 21.4%, and RIOT dropped 20.4%. MARA was the relative outperformer, down "only" 10.7%. The entire bitcoin mining complex is selling off in sympathy with crypto price action or broader risk sentiment, and WULF's 19% decline is roughly in line with the peer average rather than an outlier. That sector framing matters when interpreting the insider activity: CEO and founder Paul Prager sold 137,500 shares at $26.60 on June 29 — after having sold a further ~166,000 shares in late May around $25.80-$26.57. These are modest transactions relative to total ownership, but back-to-back executive sales into a declining price are a data point worth noting alongside the wave of bullish analyst initiations.
Q1 earnings are due August 7. The prior three prints each produced a negative first-day reaction — the most recent on June 9 saw the stock fall 10.3% before recovering 8.3% over the following five days. That pattern of sharp-then-recover is the one to watch if the HPC transition narrative holds into the next release.
See the live data behind this article on ORTEX.
Open WULF on ORTEX →ORTEX Market Intelligence content is generated by AI from a snapshot of ORTEX's proprietary data. Content is informational only and does not constitute investment advice.
