CuriosityStream heads into Wednesday's Q2 update carrying fresh wounds from a punishing May earnings reaction, with investors now weighing whether the AI licensing story can survive lumpy revenue delivery.
The stock fell 14.6% on May 14 after Q1 results missed revenue estimates, arriving at $2.52 as of the May 15 close — down 23% over the past month alone, and off 18% on the week. The options market is not positioned for another downside shock. The put/call ratio has collapsed to 0.18, near the 52-week low of 0.15 and well below the 20-day average of 0.20. That is an unusually call-heavy skew for a stock that just delivered a double-digit one-day loss. Either traders are hunting for a bounce, or protection is being left conspicuously uncovered ahead of the print.
Short positioning does not amplify the pressure. Short interest runs at 3.7% of free float — modest for a small-cap streaming name — and has barely moved, up just 2.4% on the week. The borrow market reflects the same indifference: cost to borrow remains near 0.6%, and availability is deep at roughly 488%, meaning shares-available-to-borrow dwarf the current short position by nearly five to one. Nothing in the lending market signals a squeeze setup or unusual bearish conviction from the professional short community.
The debate centers on what "lumpy" licensing revenue actually means for the full-year target. Management guided $75M–$80M in 2026 revenue alongside $16M–$20M adjusted EBITDA after Q1 came in light. Barrington Research — the stock's sole active analyst — maintained its Outperform rating on May 15 but trimmed the target to $5.00 from $5.50, explicitly citing lumpy licensing as the concern. At $2.52, the stock trades at a 98% discount to that target, though the size of that gap should be read as a reflection of the market's skepticism about execution rather than a near-term catalyst signal. Bulls point to the AI video training data licensing pipeline: CuriosityStream forecast up to $80M in 2026 revenue as that business expands, and forward EPS momentum ranks in the 98th percentile of ORTEX's universe — an unusually strong reading. The declared $0.085 quarterly dividend, representing a yield north of 11% at current prices, underlines management's stated confidence in cash generation. Bears watch the Q1 miss and note that the company still reports a net loss, with return on assets deeply negative and quality factor scores near the bottom of the universe.
Founder John Hendricks holds 21% of shares outstanding and has not changed his position, providing a degree of anchor ownership. CEO Clint Stinchcomb sold roughly 197,000 shares at $3.27 in March — before the May slide — and retains a 4.8% stake. No institutional holders of consequence trimmed in the most recent period; Los Angeles Capital Management and Renaissance Technologies both added meaningfully in Q1. Wednesday's print is less about whether the AI licensing narrative is valid and more about whether revenue can land in a pattern smooth enough to rebuild confidence in management's annual target.
See the live data behind this article on ORTEX.
Open CURI on ORTEX →ORTEX Market Intelligence content is generated by AI from a snapshot of ORTEX's proprietary data. Content is informational only and does not constitute investment advice.
