Interactive Brokers Group closed Tuesday at $83.45, down 3.1% on the day and 1.3% on the week — a sharp reversal from a stock that had been up 34% year-to-date heading into its Q1 print. The tension is simple: analysts raised targets aggressively in late April, yet the stock is trading below those targets and now drifting lower, with options positioning edging more defensive.
The most striking feature of the past month is the consensus upgrade cycle that followed Q1 results. Goldman Sachs raised its target to $98 while holding its Buy rating. BMO Capital lifted to $93, Barclays to $93, and Piper Sandler to $88 — all maintaining positive ratings. That sweep of upward revisions pushed the mean target to $86, which now sits above the current price at $83.45. The bull case rests on revenue that grew 16.8% year-on-year last quarter to $1.64 billion, operating income of $1.26 billion, and a gross margin running near 93%. Returns on equity came in at 22.4%, strong for a brokerage. The bear case is valuation: the trailing P/E is 143 and the P/B has compressed nearly four points over the past 30 days to 1.92, a sign the market is slowly asking whether the growth deserves that multiple. One contrarian note came from KBW, which reinstated with a Market Perform and a $75 target — notably below the pack — suggesting at least one house is not buying the momentum.
Positioning is not the story here, but it offers some context. Short interest is modest at 2.4% of the free float, up about 8% over the past month but well off the April 9th peak near 12 million shares. Borrow conditions are entirely benign: availability is running at over 5,600% — meaning there are roughly 56 shares available to borrow for every one currently shorted — and cost to borrow sits at just 0.32%. Those numbers confirm this is not a stock where short sellers are pressing hard or finding it difficult to source shares. The short score of 32.4 is low and barely moved over the past two weeks, suggesting no meaningful build in bearish positioning. Options are mildly more interesting: the put/call ratio has crept to 0.65, about 1.3 standard deviations above the 20-day average of 0.62. That is a modest but notable shift toward protection, consistent with the stock's post-earnings softness.
The earnings history reinforces the caution. The Q1 2026 print produced a 1-day decline of about 1.9%, followed by a 5-day gain of 1.8% — a shallow dip-and-recover. But an earlier event in the data showed a 1-day drop of 3.9% and a 5-day follow-through of -4.6%. The pattern is not consistent enough to call directional, but the market has been inclined to sell first and ask questions later on fresh results. The next event is scheduled for July 14.
Institutional ownership adds one notable data point. FMR (Fidelity) added roughly 5.3 million shares in the March quarter — a substantial new commitment. Two Sigma also added 4.8 million. Those moves sit against Cantillon Capital trimming by 1.5 million and Egerton Capital cutting by 664,000. The founder, Thomas Peterffy, holds 1.36% and has not changed his position in reported data. Net insider activity over the past 90 days is a marginal positive — a $2 million net buy — though almost entirely driven by Director Lori Conkling's small routine purchases of 25 shares per month. Independent Director Lawrence Harris sold $2 million of stock on April 28. Neither side constitutes a strong signal.
The week ahead centres on whether the stock can hold the low $80s. Analysts are clustered above the price with Buy-equivalent ratings, but the gap between the mean target and spot has narrowed since April's upgrades. Q2 results on July 14 will be the next hard data point, and how commission volumes and margin balances tracked through the spring volatility will determine whether the Q1 beat was structural or seasonal.
See the live data behind this article on ORTEX.
Open IBKR on ORTEX →ORTEX Market Intelligence content is generated by AI from a snapshot of ORTEX's proprietary data. Content is informational only and does not constitute investment advice.
