Walmart has now lost 14% over the past month and an additional 4.6% this week — yet options traders are still leaning bullish, the Street hasn't flinched, and the June 4 event is less than 24 hours away.
The options signal is the standout. The put/call ratio has eased to 0.87, roughly 1.6 standard deviations below its 20-day average of 1.00 — meaning call buying continues to dominate despite the stock falling further to $113.06. That reading is close to the most bullish options positioning WMT has seen in the past year; only the 52-week PCR low of 0.72 is more skewed toward calls. The direction of travel here is consistent with what was noted earlier this week: options traders have been fading the tape drop rather than hedging into it, and that posture has not changed as the June 4 date approaches.
The lending market remains entirely detached from the price action. Short interest is just 1.0% of the free float — low by any measure — though it has climbed 11% over the past week and 23% over the past month in share terms, edging from roughly 68 million to 83 million shares short. That is still a trivial position relative to the float, and borrow availability confirms there is no squeeze pressure whatsoever: availability runs above 6,000% of shares borrowed, meaning the lending pool is essentially unlimited. Cost to borrow is 0.35% annualised, fractionally below its one-week level. Short sellers are accumulating slowly, not aggressively — positioning looks opportunistic rather than high-conviction.
The Street has not materially revised its view. Consensus remains a firm Buy with 29 Buy-rated analysts on record. Following the May 21 earnings shock, UBS and RBC Capital both trimmed targets — UBS from $147 to $141, RBC from $140 to $137 — while maintaining positive ratings. Tigress Financial went the other way, raising its target to $155. The net effect is that the mean target cluster sits in the $137–$155 range against a stock now at $113, implying 20–35% upside on Street models. The bear case centres on valuation: the stock still trades at roughly 37x trailing earnings and 8x book, and the EV/EBITDA multiple of 18.9x has compressed by about 0.4x over 30 days as the price has fallen — but not nearly enough to resolve the premium that bears have flagged for some time. The forward EPS trajectory scores in only the 19th percentile for year-on-year growth, a consistent drag on the value and growth factor scores.
The Walton family selling, highlighted in prior notes, has continued. Trades filed through May 28 show the Walton Family Holdings Trust and CEO C. Douglas McMillon selling in aggregate across the final week of May, with the Trust alone disposing of shares worth tens of millions at prices between $119 and $121 — levels now well above where the stock trades today. Net insider activity over 90 days remains a net sale. In isolation that reads as negative pressure, but with the Walton entities still controlling roughly 37% of shares through Walton Enterprises alone and significance scores running at 2-3 out of 10, the pattern reads as routine distribution rather than a change in view. Closest peer COST dropped 4.9% on the week, broadly in line with WMT's 4.6% decline, suggesting the sector as a whole is repricing rather than WMT underperforming its peer group. BJ bucked the trend, gaining 4.3% on the week.
The only reading that matters now is Thursday's June 4 event. The last print produced an 8.1% one-day drop and a 9.1% five-day loss despite headline beats — the pattern established by the two most recent earnings reactions is that the stock has sold off sharply regardless of the revenue and EPS numbers. Whether the call-heavy options positioning reflects genuine conviction about a different outcome this time, or simply bet-sizing on a mean-reversion trade after a 14% drawdown, is the question the tape will answer in the next session.
See the live data behind this article on ORTEX.
Open WMT on ORTEX →ORTEX Market Intelligence content is generated by AI from a snapshot of ORTEX's proprietary data. Content is informational only and does not constitute investment advice.